Which measure fits, whether the records support it, how an opposing report holds up, or what expertise the matter needs — describe what you are dealing with and we will tell you plainly what it would take.
Every inquiry is read by a person. If something is time-sensitive — an expert disclosure deadline, a Daubert briefing schedule, a discovery cut-off approaching, or a report just served on you — say so and it moves to the front of the queue.
Four fields are required: your name, an address we can reply to, and a description of the dispute. The rest helps us respond usefully the first time rather than with a round of questions.
Thank you — your message is with the team and someone will respond, usually within one business day. If something is urgent, the fastest route is Cournot, the damages concierge in the corner of this page.
The damages methodology decision is a discovery decision, and it is usually made implicitly. Before-and-after needs monthly financials across a pre-conduct baseline. A gain-based measure needs the defendant’s revenue and cost detail, which has to be specifically requested. A valuation needs comparable-company evidence. Firms that settle their damages theory after the cut-off routinely find the records supporting their strongest measure were never sought — and by then the option is gone rather than merely expensive.